FileFront Forums

FileFront Forums (http://forums.filefront.com/)
-   FH2 Suggestions (http://forums.filefront.com/fh2-suggestions-486/)
-   -   New Zealand? (http://forums.filefront.com/fh2-suggestions/218581-new-zealand.html)

Johannes October 5th, 2005 11:17 PM

Re: New Zealand?
 
Woah, NZ forces vs. Italian Forces at Monte Cassino? Italy had long been on the Allied side by the time the battle of Monte Cassino happened. In fact, the Italians were helping the Allies at Monte Cassino. Italy began peace talks after the fall of Sicily and switched to the Allied side immediately after the invasion of the Straits of Messina (Operation Baytown in BF1942). In any case, New Zealanders might be all right for the village of Cassino, but the monastery would best involve Polish soldiers in the battle.

And Australia vs. Free French in Syria? Uhhhh.... The Free French were on the Allied side. They helped the British take Syria. Do you mean the Vichy French by any chance? I don't know, but I think you're a tad confused as to the post-1940 French.

ANZACSAS October 5th, 2005 11:53 PM

Re: New Zealand?
 
johannes has spoken everyone bow befor him

Nuggetman October 7th, 2005 10:05 PM

Re: New Zealand?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Johannès
Woah, NZ forces vs. Italian Forces at Monte Cassino? Italy had long been on the Allied side by the time the battle of Monte Cassino happened.

Then why did they fight?

spartanlegend October 7th, 2005 10:24 PM

Re: New Zealand?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Johannès
Woah, NZ forces vs. Italian Forces at Monte Cassino?

My bad sorry i should have picked that up. I meant germans in Italy. The New zealands did attack monte cassino but unsuccessfully, the town of Cassino would be much better

Quote:

And Australia vs. Free French in Syria? Uhhhh.... The Free French were on the Allied side. They helped the British take Syria. Do you mean the Vichy French by any chance? I don't know, but I think you're a tad confused as to the post-1940 French.
I assumed that the Free French would have similar weapon set to the French, in hindsight i should have said french rather then free, but i did mean the French in Syria.

ANZACSAS October 7th, 2005 11:48 PM

Re: New Zealand?
 
i would love to roll my tank down the steet of baghdad but tha was in ww1 that we aussies were there! but i would love to fight as the iraqi forces or the other three french froces.
how is what i wrote been a idiot?

AussiePepsi October 7th, 2005 11:53 PM

Re: New Zealand?
 
Anzac Why do you keep posting off topic crap..

Nuggetman October 8th, 2005 12:06 AM

Re: New Zealand?
 
Anzac, it's better to seem like an idiot than to click the reply button and confirm it.

And as to my question above, disregard it - they fighting Germans... righty.

spartanlegend October 8th, 2005 02:16 AM

Re: New Zealand?
 
Anzac= self :0wned:

Unky Joe October 8th, 2005 05:30 PM

Re: New Zealand?
 
hmmm, i think i am the second kiwi to post on this thread. nz would be wicked on fh, i just hope the bob semple tank doesn't get modeled. by the way new zealanders don't say fush and chups! it is a 'i' not a 'u' . you aussies say it really high pitched.
i would be cool to have a nz vs japan map, i think the nz air force shot 102 japanese planes. although i wouldn't really care if there are kiwis in fh but it would be cool. NEW ZEALANDERS RULE!

spartanlegend October 8th, 2005 06:59 PM

Re: New Zealand?
 
lol I love how this is degrading into a Aus vs NZ contest, like everything else were involved in together. There was a New Zealand and Japan battle but i can't think of it right now.
lol As for the cross sea flaming: I can say "Sheep Jokes" to the New Zealanders and the Australian Language is high pitched but you can thank "Kath n Kim" for that.


All times are GMT -7.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.