IL-2 Sturmovik - Page 2

Von Mudra · March 15th, 2005

.....um, what is the point of that post?

***shappenfit*** · March 15th, 2005

looks like a complaint :P

Von Mudra · March 15th, 2005

2 look like it, but the 2nd one, on the 109 vrs. P-40, shouldn't be...10 20mm rounds would knock down a p-40, easy. Hell, 7 would do the trick.

Anlushac11 · March 15th, 2005

Stay on target. FrederF it is a legitimate complaint you have and has been brought up before. Please feel free to start a thread in General Dsicussion about it.

~~USMA2010~~ · March 15th, 2005

The Il-2 is not only underarmored, but under represented as well.

I would love to see this change in code as well. Plust I would love to see the Il-2 3M variant with dual 37mm anti-tank autocannons in place of the 23mm ShVAK cannon. Plus some early generation, single seat Sturmoviks would be a nice addition.

***Frederf*** · March 15th, 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anlushac11

Stay on target. FrederF it is a legitimate complaint you have and has been brought up before. Please feel free to start a thread in General Dsicussion about it.

Sorry about that. Just meaning to pontificate about how these little errors abound in the world of FH aviation. I also tend to kvetch for the heck of it when posting. Anyway, the IL-2 does seem rather vulnerable when it should be more resilliant against ammunition 20mm and below. Give the tailgunner a fighting chance to bring a 109 down