FileFront Forums

FileFront Forums (http://forums.filefront.com/)
-   FH2 Suggestions (http://forums.filefront.com/fh2-suggestions-486/)
-   -   Swaying machineguns. (http://forums.filefront.com/fh2-suggestions/181624-swaying-machineguns.html)

MG-34 March 6th, 2005 09:02 AM

Swaying machineguns.
 
Instead of having the crosshair going so large on the machineguns why not implement the swaying as on the at-rifles. I think it would be more realistic. Also why not make so if you choose the machinegun on the german team one gets the MG42 and the other the MG34 like with the PPSH with 35 and 71 roung magazines?:naughty:

D-Fens March 6th, 2005 10:14 AM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
sway for all weapons would be more realistic

King_Nothing100 March 6th, 2005 10:15 AM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
And shite.

McGibs March 6th, 2005 10:23 AM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
they do sway.

D-Fens March 6th, 2005 10:48 AM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Nothing100
And shite.

why would it be worse than crosshair spread?

Gauntlet March 6th, 2005 11:19 AM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MG-34
Also why not make so if you choose the machinegun on the german team one gets the MG42 and the other the MG34 like with the PPSH with 35 and 71 roung magazines?:naughty:

Because, IMO, the MG42 is a realy bad-ass weapon as it is, and I dont think it should be a spawnable class. I'd say just the MG34 is good enough for me.

D-Fens March 6th, 2005 11:53 AM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
the bipod mg42 is pretty rare in fh now..

USMA2010 March 6th, 2005 11:54 AM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
Yeah. In the grand scheme of things, 1200rpm versus 900rpm is not that big of a difference...

Gauntlet March 6th, 2005 12:20 PM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
sure they used those RPM in FH? Even if the orginal weapons was like that...

mrchee March 6th, 2005 05:32 PM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
The mg42 is faster than the mg34 in FH, but i dont think that the MG42 is goin anywhere near 1200 rpm [thats 20 bullets a second].

Personally i prefer the MG34 kit over the MG42 kit. The MG34 has a lower ROF, so the crosshairs never actually expand while you hold down fire. The MG42 has such a high ROF that the crosshairs expand, ruining the accuracy

[SYN] hydraSlav March 7th, 2005 05:49 PM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
I've been long (for almost a year) pushing the idea of replacing crosshair expansion completely with the sway-n-swing

Ohioan March 7th, 2005 05:54 PM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
It would be retarded. Just leave it as is.

Frederf March 7th, 2005 06:42 PM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by [SYN] hydraSlav
I've been long (for almost a year) pushing the idea of replacing crosshair expansion completely with the sway-n-swing

Only for emplaced guns then, because ppl were getting sick with moving and sway effects.

MG-34 March 8th, 2005 08:24 AM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ohioan
It would be retarded. Just leave it as is.

Retarded? Isnīt it more retarded that after taking one step the bullets go everywhere like 2 meters up in the air? Though i only think it should be on heavy weapons.

GreatGrizzly March 8th, 2005 11:25 AM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Frederf
Only for emplaced guns then, because ppl were getting sick with moving and sway effects.

umm the whole pont of fixed gun turrets was to improve accuracy and to NOT have sway

[SYN] Ace March 8th, 2005 03:50 PM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by [SYN] hydraSlav
I've been long (for almost a year) pushing the idea of replacing crosshair expansion completely with the sway-n-swing

No cross hairs, iron sites, and sway -- I finally played Red Orchestra this week and that's realism, and well done.

Frederf March 8th, 2005 03:56 PM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
The sway would be tiny then.

Tas March 8th, 2005 04:00 PM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MG-34
Retarded? Isnīt it more retarded that after taking one step the bullets go everywhere like 2 meters up in the air? Though i only think it should be on heavy weapons.

If you would just stick with a sway you can use mg's as assault weapons, you would simply have to compensate to gun everyone down with ease. It works for AT rifles because their rof is so low. But with an mg42/34 it would turn nasty.

Mako275 March 8th, 2005 04:54 PM

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 
I hate crosshairs period. Once I was playing regular BF and this guy popped around a corner, he wasn't more than a foot away from me and I die because my crosshairs were so expanded that my bullets hit ground behind him instead of him :confused: Im all for iron sights love em and woundnt change them a bit.


All times are GMT -7.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.