Re: Swaying machineguns.
 

I've been long (for almost a year) pushing the idea of replacing crosshair expansion completely with the sway-n-swing

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 

It would be retarded. Just leave it as is.

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 

Only for emplaced guns then, because ppl were getting sick with moving and sway effects.

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 

Retarded? Isn´t it more retarded that after taking one step the bullets go everywhere like 2 meters up in the air? Though i only think it should be on heavy weapons.

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 

umm the whole pont of fixed gun turrets was to improve accuracy and to NOT have sway

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 

No cross hairs, iron sites, and sway -- I finally played Red Orchestra this week and that's realism, and well done.

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 

The sway would be tiny then.

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 

If you would just stick with a sway you can use mg's as assault weapons, you would simply have to compensate to gun everyone down with ease. It works for AT rifles because their rof is so low. But with an mg42/34 it would turn nasty.

Re: Swaying machineguns.
 

I hate crosshairs period. Once I was playing regular BF and this guy popped around a corner, he wasn't more than a foot away from me and I die because my crosshairs were so expanded that my bullets hit ground behind him instead of him :confused: Im all for iron sights love em and woundnt change them a bit.