![]() |
Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Why are all the Japanese maps only featuring the Americans?? A considerable amount of Japanese battles were fought against the British and Australians! How about some maps like.... Invasion of Singapore (could have urban/tropical, with beach landing by Japanese). Invasion of Hong Kong (have a harbor and urban setting, again, with buildings borrowed from maps like Berlin). Dutch East Indies; this campaign involved Dutch, British, American, and Japanese. It was one of the major campaigns in which the Japanese employed paratroopers. You could have a Dutch East Indies map with chains of islands defended by the British, British planes (Hurricanes), give the Japanese a carrier, a destroyer or two, give the British one destroyer, and also give the Japanese a small island ala Crete invasion where they can load up their paratroopers. |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Dunno, maybe because USA is the most famous.. Itīs stupid.. |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras some British Vs. Japan maps would be great but i dont know if theyll be adding an austrailian army anny time soon. |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras buuuuuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrmmmmmmmmmaaaaaaaaaaa |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras I agree, Burma fighting through thick Vietnam like jungles would be awesome. I wish you'd record some Scottish voice commands for the Black Watch. 'Freeeeedom!' |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Would be some interesting and (i think) very balanced battles. Any of you know which equipment the british used in Burma? Any tanks? |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Ligth tanks, Jungle Carbine, Jungle hat's... Many thing's Just do some search at google and you will find it... |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Quote:
|
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras I would love to see the Australians though...probably because I basically know NOTHING about their battles against the Japs. Sounds educational. I wonder if Canadians ever fought the Japs. I mean they did have the 3rd largest navy at the end of WWII so maybe they fought the japs a little? Dunno.. |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Quote:
|
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Quote:
|
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Brits, Aussies, New Zealanders, Indians, Gurka's and even volunteer Asians fought the Japanese in Singapore, Hong Kong and Burma. Hong Kong is part of China, you are thinking of TAIWAN. |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Quote:
Other than Hong Kong, did the Canadians fight the Japs? |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras I'd like to see this jungle Carbine. |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras If I remember myself properly,I think the developers presented a Jungle-Rifle on the homepage once. I think it was a Jungle-Thompson or a Carbine,but for the British troops,not the Americans. Either this weapon was on the homepage or some develper announced it here in the Forum,I don't know it exactly anymore. Well I think that we all can expect some maps featuring the Brits in the Pacific theatre in some version in the future.I would welcome it and I think a lot of others aswell. As the other people have already mentioned,it would be cool to see a Burma,a Singapore map (Urban battle),or maybe even a map located in the jungle of Thailand featuring the British. |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Quote:
Why do you blame me!? |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Quote:
|
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Quote:
Hong Kong is an idland of Guangzong (sp?) provence in CHINA, Singapore is a country within itself and is on the sounthern tip of MALAYSIA, "we" did not invade japan because "we" knew that the casualties would be to high ON BOTH SIDES. I suggest you do YOUR homework and go back to studying AWP whoring =/. [edit] Forgot to add, The Ignorance is killing me. |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Quote:
|
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras I agree, a Burma map d be great. Someone should make a Burmaroad battle. Maybe dated in march 42, after the fall of singapore. But also the fall of singapore would be a great map. So anyone should go a head and make on. :D |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Quote:
1. Brittish, and Chinese added into this part of the game. 2. More of the weapons used in this front, Type-44, Johnson Rifle, Grease Gun, Type-100 SMG, and so on. 3. redo the fallowing maps: Midway, that Island was bigger than that. With with two carriers per side and torpedo bombers, and planes. Guadalcanal, needs those cool Vine covered trees from DICE used in the Phillipenes, and bushes, and Pistol pete, with Japanese AT guns, and a true Beach assault like it was, not set in the midle of the battle. 4. More Torpedo bombers, and ships on the island maps, and AT guns for the Japs, and US forces that they did use. |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Redoing maps is a good point. Afaik there was no fighting on midway itself. Just the sea battle... |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Im with mcgibs, but im gonna 1 up him Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmm Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras oh oh, the japs had 4 carriers at midway, 3 normal, 1 escort. the us had 3. |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras But the japs did a major mistake with their planes while the us-planes were on the way to destroy the carriers. |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras The Americans sent torpedo bombers and dive bombers at the Jap carriers. Because the dive bombers had to climb to altitude, the torpedo bombers got to the carriers first. They were then ripped apart by the Japanese fighters. However, because all the jap fighters were close to sea level in order to engage our torpedo bombers, they weren't able to get to altitude in time to engage the dive bombers, and the dive bombers were then able to drop their payloads. Essentially, the torpedo bombers sacrificed themselves so that the dive bombers could get through, though I am quite certain that was not the original intent. Thus we destroyed all four of their carriers, and they critically damaged one of ours, the USS Lexington. It survived the battle, but was so badly damaged they deemed it unsalvageable given the current state of the war (not enough time or available manpower) and so they evacuated it and purposely sank it. Additionally every single Japanese aircraft in Midway was destroyed, while almost all of their pilots (which included many of their most experienced ones) were killed. |
Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras Please can we get back on topic? Anywho, I'd really like some Scottish accented voice commands for this theatre. The Black Watch, Britains finest Celtic Regiment fought sucessfully in Burma. |
| All times are GMT -7. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.