FileFront Forums

FileFront Forums (http://forums.filefront.com/)
-   FH2 Suggestions (http://forums.filefront.com/fh2-suggestions-486/)
-   -   Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras (http://forums.filefront.com/fh2-suggestions/129507-japanese-vs-british-why-not-japanese-paras.html)

Starfighter June 16th, 2004 07:23 AM

Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lachrymology
I agree, a Burma map d be great. Someone should make a Burmaroad battle. Maybe dated in march 42, after the fall of singapore.
But also the fall of singapore would be a great map.

So anyone should go a head and make on. :D

I think that this theater needs four things:

1. Brittish, and Chinese added into this part of the game.

2. More of the weapons used in this front, Type-44, Johnson Rifle, Grease Gun, Type-100 SMG, and so on.

3. redo the fallowing maps:

Midway, that Island was bigger than that. With with two carriers per side and torpedo bombers, and planes.

Guadalcanal, needs those cool Vine covered trees from DICE used in the Phillipenes, and bushes, and Pistol pete, with Japanese AT guns, and a true Beach assault like it was, not set in the midle of the battle.

4. More Torpedo bombers, and ships on the island maps, and AT guns for the Japs, and US forces that they did use.

Lachrymology June 16th, 2004 08:33 AM

Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras
 
Redoing maps is a good point. Afaik there was no fighting on midway itself. Just the sea battle...

USMA2010 June 16th, 2004 09:10 AM

Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras
 
Im with mcgibs, but im gonna 1 up him
Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmm
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

USMA2010 June 16th, 2004 09:11 AM

Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras
 
oh oh, the japs had 4 carriers at midway, 3 normal, 1 escort. the us had 3.

Lachrymology June 16th, 2004 09:51 AM

Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras
 
But the japs did a major mistake with their planes while the us-planes were on the way to destroy the carriers.

Xenomorph June 16th, 2004 10:57 AM

Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras
 
The Americans sent torpedo bombers and dive bombers at the Jap carriers. Because the dive bombers had to climb to altitude, the torpedo bombers got to the carriers first. They were then ripped apart by the Japanese fighters. However, because all the jap fighters were close to sea level in order to engage our torpedo bombers, they weren't able to get to altitude in time to engage the dive bombers, and the dive bombers were then able to drop their payloads. Essentially, the torpedo bombers sacrificed themselves so that the dive bombers could get through, though I am quite certain that was not the original intent. Thus we destroyed all four of their carriers, and they critically damaged one of ours, the USS Lexington. It survived the battle, but was so badly damaged they deemed it unsalvageable given the current state of the war (not enough time or available manpower) and so they evacuated it and purposely sank it. Additionally every single Japanese aircraft in Midway was destroyed, while almost all of their pilots (which included many of their most experienced ones) were killed.

[Spartans]Nurdy June 16th, 2004 12:08 PM

Re: Japanese vs British?? WHY NOT?...Japanese paras
 
Please can we get back on topic?

Anywho, I'd really like some Scottish accented voice commands for this theatre. The Black Watch, Britains finest Celtic Regiment fought sucessfully in Burma.


All times are GMT -7.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.