FileFront Forums - BF2 pics ..

FileFront Forums (http://forums.filefront.com/)

- FH Off Topic (http://forums.filefront.com/fh-off-topic-579/)

- - BF2 pics .. (http://forums.filefront.com/fh-off-topic/122380-bf2-pics.html)

Quote:

Originally posted by Ky Kiske

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesemancrusader
who the f*** is that? middle east coalition? if it is thats retarded. Iraq, Iran, and Jordan couldnt even take over Israel which is the size of my freakin back yard. I cant remeber that last time i saw an Iraqi or what have you w/ body armour. Why not Russia there always pissed at someone, kinda like us (U.S.A.). and instead of china, why not North Korea. They're supposed to be some bad mofo's arn't they?

....they look kinda cool though in the pic....

Aside from your bad spelling...

Israel is armed with U.S supplied weapons...hint...

Russian military has been drastatically reduce since the Soviet collasped, they are the Russian's Mafia bitches now.

You know China millitary very strong and capable of handling it's own right? It's not troop size that makes them strong, they are also a modernized army than most people think. China is one of the only nations left that can probably hold it's own against us (U.S). North Korea is quite pathetic on the other hand...

And this IS supposly in the 'future' maybe the Middle Eastern Coaliation funded alot in military development in this period =X

I am very sorry if my inadequate typing abilities offended you (since it has everything to do with the topic...)

Israel is far more organized than any Middle Eastern country. If you give Israel U.S. weapons and you give Syria, Iran, Iraq (choose your favorite) U.S. weapons as well and Israel will still whoop them. When you say "And this IS supposly in the 'future' maybe the Middle Eastern Coaliation funded alot in military development in this period =X" you merely state EA/Dices/whoever's logic which as i stated before is very "retarded".

As for Russian military, i do not to profess they are an elite or a strong world power, but i do know of some forum members who would highly detest your statement.

When i suggest South Korea to be a side in the fight, i was just thinking of the country most likely to go to war within the near future. As for North Korea being pathetic you never know, the vietnamese were viewed as pathetic, and iraq was saw as one of the strongest military powers in the world. We all know how both those instances turned out...

My kiske, I really don't think he has bad spelling, but i dont think people will bother with grammar unless it's formal.:)

and cheeseman, he is supposedly right, this has nothing to do with history at all, it's just C&C Generals FPS-style.:D

And when you say this is EA/Dice's retarded logic, well yeah, i guess it is retarded.:beer:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Of The P!ngs

looks like shit

While I won't put it as delicately as he did, yea. They're not that impressive - not BAD, but not all that good. HL2 pics blow those away 3 times over again. I think they could do a lot better and add some really innovative graphics features. GFX have always been secondary for BF games, but there's no real reason for that since all the rendering is done client side.

How about some Pixel Shader 3.0 support?

It looks nice...but imagine all the lag...plus the problem that it is not WWII...and if FH won't go over to that, I will certainly not go either...

he he he, looks like ill be upgrading before the release of that, man i can see the posts on there website now.. "lags like hell" "good computer, runs like crap"

and i cant wait to play it

i dont understand why they take pictures without AA turned on :/

This 'AA' can it be done on any G Card?

Yes it can, although it looks nice in BF1942/FH/BF:V it f**ks up the writing on the screen.

..Oh and no 'middle east coalition' wears body armour like that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1337 MG42Maniac

This 'AA' can it be done on any G Card?

Some cards are more suited for it than others. Like the Radeons you can get right now (9500 - 9800) run faster with AA than their GeForce-counterparts (or so I have heard).
Well, the new GeForce is supposed to own everything over again, but who wants to spend 600 bucks for a frigging gfx card every 6 month?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAM

http://www.fpscentral.com/siteimages/5/news/0064/Prep4Battle.jpg looking good :)

either they're confused on what an abrams looks like, or iraq is full of white dudes.