A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

I'm sorry but I've been thinking RtCW mod all day and my father just sent this to me. It's supposed to be about a serious subject but given my current mind set, this is just too funny. Especially since it unintentionally parallels the RtCW story line... The rain at the beginning is the clincher...

Return to Castle Bushenstein

Desperately trying to stay away from the whole revealing sides on the issue part of all of this, the visions this spawns are just too rich to resist! I can see little half Bush monsters floating around through the halls. She'd have to switch sides but Hillary would just look great in the elite guard outfit!

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

HEHE I still think this is funny! AAAAANNNNDDDD two years later still appropriate!

And go figure but Hillary is moving even closer to the being in the Elite Guard!

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

:rofl:
Oh my, I just don't know what to say. That first post must have been before my time. How...how sad.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

DOESN'T it look lie the intro to RtCW?????? It's uncanny!

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

OMG!!! That is too funny.....however it would be more realistic if instead of Bush you had someone like Al Gore or Kerry.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

i knew you'd say something like that dave! :lol: why no replies to that post Q? maby before everybodies time?? :D funny though...musta been a die hard gamer that made this, eh?

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

I always wondered that myself. It was a slower time for the forum but not that slow!
Plus this thread had 84 views! I would have thought someone would have posted SOMETHING!

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

No.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

You crack me up!!! Should have been Al Gore working in his lab to create his stupid "lock box" What a tard!!:nodding:

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

This doesn't mean Bush is intelligent. You can't compare stupidity with stupidity. And Bush is beyond comparison.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

:gpost: :agreed :ditto: ..... Biggus lets not forget to add that Bush is Evil ....

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

And for the europeans, Bush is a dumbass:lol:

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

....maybe.....but he was right!!! Good things coming out of the middle east now!!

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

:Puzzled: And where, exactly?

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Good things? So Amis went home? No more murdering there?

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Everybody seems to think that Bush is stupid or something, but the man graduated from Yale and got an MBA from Harvard. I don't have a Masters of anything from anywhere, so he's got my respect on that front. You don't like his policies, fine, call him whatever names you want. But please don't insult the man's intelligence.

Oh please. :rolleyes: If you think Bush is Evil, you have no idea what evil is. I don't think he is The White, but he's certainly not evil.

@Biteme - and speaking of names, keep yourself above the fray my friend. I don't like Gore either, but again he's hardly stupid.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Ill pass on this mod i recon .. not alot of peace in iraq dave :( pockets perhaps


enough said ........every 1 to there own :naughty: PURE EVIL HE IS NOT ,TRUE PREACHER !!:cool:
nice 1 Q :beer:MY Last words there both as bad as each other in my country ..lies, BS there both simler :lol:

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

lol preacher....I agree with ya. Sometimes I get dragged off into the mud. I am a big Bush fan and go astray when people attack him without knowing what he is really all about.....


Oh and while im in the mud and we are talking evil.......here's a pic for ya

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Kerry needs to be in his own mod - that would be pretty funny!

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Not everyone gets his informations in FAUX news, you know...

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

I actually do admire Gore for his stands even if he is an easy target for other reasons. Gore beating Bush would have been a better outcome than allowing a part timer like Perot or the eratic Buchanan to win (or a third term for Clinton) Anyway, I found this pic while surfing for Undead quotes the other day... I laughed and saved it but I never thought I'd get a chance to use it....

http://forums.filefront.com/attachme...chmentid=29717

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

I refuse to get into a battle of the wits with a liberal...it's unfair to fight an unarmed person:naughty: :cya:

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Pope fears Bush is antichrist, journalist contends - Church - journalist Wayne Madsden - Brief Article
Catholic New Times, May 18, 2003

Save a personal copy of this article and quickly find it again with Furl.net. Get started now. (It's free.)
WASHINGTON DC -- According to freelance journalist Wayne Madsden, "George W Bush's blood lust, his repeated commitment to Christian beliefs and his constant references to 'evil doers,' in the eyes of many devout Catholic leaders, bear all the hallmarks of the one warned about in the Book of Revelations--the anti-Christ."

Madsen, a Washington-based writer and columnist, who often writes for Counterpunch, says that people close to the pope claim that amid these concerns, the pontiff wishes he was younger and in better health to confront the possibility that Bush may represent the person prophesized in Revelations. John Paul II has always believed the world was on the precipice of the final confrontation between Good and Evil as foretold in the New Testament.

Before he became pope, Karol Cardinal Wojtyla said, "We are now standing in the face of the greatest historical confrontation humanity has gone through. I do not think that wide circles of the American society or wide circles of the Christian community realize this fully. We are now facing the final confrontation between the church and the anti-Church, of the Gospel versus the anti-Gospel."

The pope worked tirelessly to convince leaders of nations on the UN Security Council to oppose Bush's war resolution on Iraq. Vatican sources claim they had not seen the pope more animated and determined since he fell ill to Parkinson's Disease. In the end, the pope did convince the leaders of Mexico, Chile, Cameroon and Guinea to oppose the U.S. resolution.

Madsen contends that "Bush is a dangerous right-wing ideologue who couples his political fanaticism with a neo-Christian blood cult."

COPYRIGHT 2003 Catholic New Times, Inc.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Gale Group



January 4, 2003

Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory
Bush's Armageddon Obsession, Revisited
by MICHAEL ORTIZ HILL

"We are lived by forces we scarcely understand," wrote W.H. Auden. What forces live us now as America again torques toward war?

George W. Bush is certainly the plaything of such forces as the geopolitics of oil but it seems that he is susceptible to other even darker archetypal concerns. Let me be blunt. The man is delusional and the shape of his delusion is specifically apocalyptic in belief and intent. That Bush would attack so many vital systems on so many fronts from foreign policy to the environment may seem confusing from the point of view of realpolitik but becomes transparent in terms of the apocalyptic worldview to which he subscribes. All systems are supposed to go down so the Messiah can come and Bush, seemingly, has taken on the role of the one who brings this to pass.

The Reverend Billy Graham taught Bush to live in anticipation of the Second Coming but it was his friendship with Dr. Tony Evans that shaped Bush's political understanding of how to deport himself in an apocalyptic era. Dr. Evans, the pastor of a large Dallas church and a founder of the Promise Keepers movement taught Bush about "how the world should be seen from a divine viewpoint," according to Dr. Martin Hawkins, Evans assistant pastor.

S.R. Shearer of Antipas Ministries writes, "Most of the leaders of the Promise Keepers embrace a doctrine of 'end time' (eschatology), known as 'dominionim.' Dominionism pictures the seizure of earthly (temporal) power by the 'people of God' as the only means through which the world can be rescued.... It is the eschatology that Bush has imbibed; an eschatology through which he has gradually (and easily) come to see himself as an agent of God who has been called by him to 'restore the earth to God's control', a 'chosen vessel', so to speak, to bring in the Restoration of All Thingss." Shearer calls this delusion, "Messianic leadership"-- that is to say usurping the role usually ascribed to the Messiah.

In Bush at War Bob Woodward writes, "Most presidents have high hopes. Some have grandiose visions of what they will achieve, and he was firmly in that camp."

"To answer these attacks and rid the world of evil," says Bush. And again, "We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of this great nation." Grandiose visions. Woodward comments, "The president was casting his mission and that of the country in the grand vision of Gods Master Plan."

In dominionism we can see the theological source of Bush's monomania. Not to be distracted by the fact that he lost the popular election by a half a million votes, that the Joint Chief of Staff at the Pentagon were so concerned about his plans to invade Iraq that they leaked their unanimous objection, that he has systematically alienated much of the world, that roughly seventy percent of Americans remain unconvinced of the imminent threat of Saddam Hussein and the same percentage object to war if there will be significant American casualties--none of this is in the least relevant. He believes his mandate toward action is from God.

As humans we live within stories. Some stories, like apocalypse are thousands of years old. The scriptured text that informs Bush understanding of and enactment of the End of Days (Revelations 19) depicts Christ returning as the Heavenly Avenger. Revelations is the only New Testament book that justifies violence of any kind, and this it takes to the limit: Christ himself the agent of mass murder.

"I saw heaven open and there before me was a white horse who is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war...He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood and his name is the word of God...Out of his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the Nations. And I saw an angel standing in the sun who cried in a low voice to all the birds flying in midair--come gather together for the great supper of God, so you may eat the flesh of kings, generals and mighty men, of horses and their riders, and the flesh of all people, free and slave, small and great."

Such is "the glory of the coming of the Lord." Truth, carnage, and the ecstasy of vultures. In a ruined world the Messiah slays the antichrist and creates "a new heaven and a new earth." The dead are judged, the Christians saved and the rest damned to eternal torment. The New Jerusalem is established and the Lord rules it "with an iron scepter."

It is not inconceivable that Bush is literally and determinedly drawn, consciously and unconsciously, toward the enactment of such a scenario, as he believes, for God's sake. Indeed the stark relentlessness of his policy in the Middle East suggests as much.

It dishonors the profundity of the Christian tradition if one doesn't note that Revelations has always been a rogue text. Because of its association with the Montanist heresy (which like contemporary fundamentalists took it to be literal rather than allegorical) it was with great reluctance that it was made scripture three centuries after the death of Christ. Traditionally attributed to St. John, most Biblical scholars now recognize its literary style and its theology has little in common with John's gospel or his epistles and was likely written after his death. Martin Luther found the vindictive God of Revelations incompatible with the gospels and relegated it to the appendix of his German translation of the New Testament instead of the body of scripture. All the Protestant reformers except Calvin regarded apocalyptic millenialism to be heresy.

But Revelations is also a rogue text because it is unmoored from its origins, which are far from Christian. It is a late variant on a story that was pervasive in the ancient world: the defeat of the wild and the uncivilized by a superior order upon which a New World would be established. Two thousand years before Revelations depicted Christ slaying the antichrist and laying out the New Jerusalem, Marduk slayed Tiamat and founded Babylon.

This pagan myth recycled as a suspiciously unchristian Biblical test found new credence in the 19th century when John Darby virtually revived the Montanist heresy of investing it with a passionate literalism. Given to visions (he saw the British as one of the ten tribes of Israel) Darby left the priesthood of the Church of Ireland and preached Revelations as both prophecy and imminent history. In this he inaugurated a lineage in which Bush's mentors, the Reverend Billy Graham and Dr. Tony Evans are recent heirs. Revelations is much beloved by Muslim fundamentalists and like their Christian compatriots they also thrill to redemption through apocalypse. Jewish fundamentalists of course do not believe in Revelations but have nonetheless made common cause with the Christian Right. "It's a very tragic situation in which Christian fundamentalists, certain groups of them that focus on Armageddon and the Rapture and the role of a war between Muslims and Jews in bringing about the Second Coming, are involved in a folie a deux with extremist Jews," said Ian Lustick, the author of For the Land and the Lord: Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. The Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition (and yes it is a single tradition) is being led by its fringe into the abyss and the rest of us with it.

The world has been readied for the fire but the critical element is the Bush Administration. Never in the history of Christendom has there been a moment when this rogue element has carried anything like the credibility and political power that it carries now.


Bush's "Christian" Blood Cult
Concerns Raised by the Vatican
by WAYNE MADSEN

George W. Bush proclaims himself a born-again Christian. However, Bush and fellow self-anointed neo-Christians like House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, John Ashcroft, and sports arena Book of Revelations carnival hawker Franklin Graham appear to wallow in a "Christian" blood lust cult when it comes to practicing the teachings of the founder of Christianity. This cultist form of Christianity, with its emphasis on death rather than life, is also worrying the leaders of mainstream Christian religions, particularly the Pope.

One only has to check out Bush's record as Governor of Texas to see his own preference for death over life. During his tenure as Governor, Bush presided over a record setting 152 executions, including the 1998 execution of fellow born-again Christian Karla Faye Tucker, a convicted murderer who later led a prison ministry. Forty of Bush's executions were carried out in 2000, the year the Bush presidential campaign was spotlighting their candidate's strong law enforcement record. The Washington Post's Richard Cohen reported in October 2000 that one of the execution chamber's "tie-down team" members, Fred Allen, had to prepare so many people for lethal injections during 2000, he quit his job in disgust.

Bush mocked Tucker's appeal for clemency. In an interview with Talk magazine, Bush imitated Tucker's appeal for him to spare her life - pursing his lips, squinting his eyes, and in a squeaky voice saying, "Please don't kill me." That went too far for former GOP presidential candidate Gary Bauer, himself an evangelical Christian. "I think it is nothing short of unbelievable that the governor of a major state running for president thought it was acceptable to mock a woman he decided to put to death," said Bauer.

A former Texas Department of Public Safety officer, a devout Roman Catholic, told this reporter that evidence to the contrary, Bush was more than happy to ignore DNA data and documented cases of prosecutorial misconduct to send innocent people to the Huntsville, Texas lethal injection chamber. He said the number of executed mentally retarded, African Americans, and those who committed capital crimes as minors was proof that Bush was insensitive and a "phony Christian." When faced with similar problems in Illinois, Governor George Ryan, a Republican, commuted the death sentences of his state's death row inmates and released others after discovering they were wrongfully convicted. Yet the Republican Party is pillorying Ryan and John Ashcroft's Justice Department continues to investigate the former Governor for political malfeasance as if Bush and Ashcroft are without sin in such matters. Hypocrisy certainly rules in the Republican Party.

Bush's blood lust has been extended across the globe. He has given the CIA authority to assassinate those deemed a threat to U.S. national interests. Bush has virtually suspended Executive Orders 11905 (Gerald Ford), 12306 (Jimmy Carter), and 12333 (Ronald Reagan) which prohibit the assassination of foreign leaders. Bush's determination to kill Saddam Hussein, his family, and his top leaders with precision-guided missiles and tactical nuclear weapon-like Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) bombs is yet another indication of Bush's disregard for his Republican and Democratic predecessors. It now appears that in his zeal to kill Hussein, innocent civilian patrons of a Baghdad restaurant were killed by one of Bush's precision Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs). Like it or not, Saddam Hussein was recognized by over 100 nations as the leader of Iraq -- a member state of the United Nations. Hussein, like North Korea' Kim Jong Il, Syria's Bashir Assad, and Iran's Mohammed Khatami, are covered by Executive Order 12333, which the Bush mouthpieces claim is still in effect. Bush's "Christian" blood cult sees no other option than death for those who become his enemies. This doctrine is found no place in Christian theology.

Bush has not once prayed for the innocent civilians who died as a result of the U.S. attack on Iraq. He constantly "embeds" himself with the military at Goebbels-like speech fests and makes constant references to God when he refers to America's "victory" in Iraq, as if God endorses his sordid killing spree. He makes no mention of the children, women, and old men killed by America's "precision-guided" missiles and bombs and trigger-happy U.S. troops. In fact, Bush revels in indiscriminate blood letting. Since he never experienced such killing in Southeast Asia, when he was AWOL from his Texas Air National Guard unit, Bush just does not seem to understand the horror of a parent watching one's children having their heads and limbs blown off in a sudden blast of shrapnel or children witnessing their parents burning to death with their own body fat nurturing the flames.

Bush and his advisers, previously warned that Iraq's ancient artifacts and collection of historical documents and books were in danger of being looted or destroyed, instead, sat back while the Baghdad and Mosul museums and Baghdad Library were ransacked and destroyed. Cult leaders have historically attempted to destroy history in order to invent their own. The Soviets tried to obliterate Russia's Orthodox traditions, turning a number of churches into warehouses and animal barns. Cambodia's Pol Pot tried to wipe out Buddhism's famed Angkor Wat shrine in an attempt to stamp out his country's Buddhist history. In March 2001, while they were negotiating with the Bush administration on a natural gas pipeline, Afghanistan's Taliban blew up two massive 1600-year old Buddhas in Bamiyan. The Bush administration, itself run by fanatic religious cultists, barely made a fuss about the loss of the relics. It would not be the first time the cultists within the Bush administration ignored the pillaging of history's treasures.

The ransacking of Iraq's historical treasures is explainable when one considers what the blood cult Christians really think about Islam. Franklin Graham, the heir to the empire built up by his anti-Semitic father, Billy Graham, has decided being anti-Muslim is far more financially rewarding than being anti-Jewish. Billy Graham, history notes from the Nixon tapes, complained about the Jewish stranglehold on the media and Jews being responsible for pornography.

Franklin Graham continues to enjoy his father's unfettered and questionable access to the White House. But in the case of Bush, the younger Graham has a fanatic adherent. Graham has called Islam a "very evil and wicked" religion. He then announces he wants to go to Iraq. Graham obviously sees an opportunity to convert Muslims and unrepentant Eastern Christians, who owe their allegiance to Roman and Greek prelates, to his perverted form of blood cult Christianity. Graham says he is ready to send his Samaritan's Purse missionaries into Iraq to provide assistance. Muslims and mainstream Christians are wary that Graham wants to exchange food, water, and medicine for the baptism of Iraqis into his intolerant brand of Christianity. In the last Gulf War, Graham could not get away with his chicanery. The Desert Storm Commander, General Norman Schwarzkopf, stopped dead in the tracks Graham's plan to send 30,000 Arabic language Bibles to U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia. Today's Pentagon shows no such compunction to put a rein on Graham. It invited him to give a Good Friday sermon at the Pentagon to the consternation of the Defense Department's Muslim employees. To make matters worse, under Bush's "Faith Based Initiative," Graham's Samaritan's Purse stands to receive U.S. government funds for its proselytizing efforts in Iraq, something that should be an affront to every American taxpayer.

Bush's self-proclaimed adherence to Christianity (during one of the presidential debates he said Jesus Christ was his favorite "philosopher") and his constant reference to a new international structure bypassing the United Nations system and long-standing international treaties are worrying the top leadership of the Roman Catholic Church. Well-informed sources close to the Vatican report that Pope John Paul II is growing increasingly concerned about Bush's ultimate intentions. The Pope has had experience with Bush's death fetish. Bush ignored the Pope's plea to spare the life of Karla Faye Tucker. To show that he was similarly ignorant of the world's mainstream religions, Bush also rejected an appeal to spare Tucker from the World Council of Churches - an organization that represents over 350 of the world's Protestant and Orthodox Churches. It did not matter that Bush's own Methodist Church and his parents' Episcopal Church are members of the World Council.

Bush's blood lust, his repeated commitment to Christian beliefs, and his constant references to "evil doers," in the eyes of many devout Catholic leaders, bear all the hallmarks of the one warned about in the Book of Revelations - the anti-Christ. People close to the Pope claim that amid these concerns, the Pontiff wishes he was younger and in better health to confront the possibility that Bush may represent the person prophesized in Revelations. John Paul II has always believed the world was on the precipice of the final confrontation between Good and Evil as foretold in the New Testament. Before he became Pope, Karol Cardinal Wojtyla said, "We are now standing in the face of the greatest historical confrontation humanity has gone through. I do not think that wide circles of the American society or wide circles of the Christian community realize this fully. We are now facing the final confrontation between the Church and the anti-Church, of the Gospel versus the anti-Gospel." The Pope, who grew up facing the evils of Hitler and Stalin, knows evil when he sees it. Although we can all endlessly argue over the Pope's effectiveness in curtailing abuses within his Church, his accomplishments external to Catholicism are impressive.

According to journalists close to the Vatican, the Pope and his closest advisers are also concerned that the ultimate acts of evil - the September 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon - were known in advance by senior Bush administration officials. By permitting the attacks to take their course, there is a perception within the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy that a coup d'etat was implemented, one that gave Bush and his leadership near-dictatorial powers to carry out their agenda.

The Pope worked tirelessly to convince leaders of nations on the UN Security Council to oppose Bush's war resolution on Iraq. Vatican sources claim they had not seen the Pope more animated and determined since he fell ill to Parkinson's Disease. In the end, the Pope did convince the leaders of Mexico, Chile, Cameroon, and Guinea to oppose the U.S. resolution. If one were to believe in the Book of Revelations, as the Pope fervently does, he can seek solace in scoring a symbolic victory against the Bush administration. Whether Bush represents a dangerous right-wing ideologue who couples his political fanaticism with a neo-Christian blood cult (as I believe) or he is either the anti-Christ or heralds one, the Pope should know he has fought the good battle and has gained the respect and admiration of many non-Catholics around the world.

Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist and columnist.





Enough said. I could post many other writings from non-denominational churches, but I don’t want to Spam this thread.... To those who say that Bush is not evil and say that they have faith in GOD.. I believe need to examine their hearts and look at the facts not their pocket book....




Peace……………. VONNER

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

See what you did Queeg!!! lol

What started as a harmless, intended to be funny post, has turned into a forum for religious/political bantor.

I wonder how many other prophesied anti-christs have fizzled to the embarassment of the church?

We play a video game involving killing, that many denominational/non-denominational religious groups would say is the hand of the devil himself reaching into our homes and stealing our souls. I for one don't think there is a cosmic giant, striding around the universe, doling out eternal bliss and damnation (whatever that means).

I'm a taoist...The world is as it should be...just as it always has been and will be. it can't be anything else.:deal:

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Kill...Kill....kill.....KILL!!!


All the bandito's must die before my conservative gattling gun!!!:beer:

An interesting side note....Clint the man is a Conservative Republican.....

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

you got it partner:beer:

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

OK Vonner - I give up. I really was going to make a thurough response to your articles, but all I had to do was Google one of your authors and I turned that pony right on around. From Democratic Underground:

Wayne Madsen is a Washington, D.C.-based investigative journalist and syndicated columnist who has recently written a series of articles exposing election fraud in the 2004 US elections. He is the author of "Jaded Tasks: Big Oil, Black Ops, and Brass Plates", and is the co-author, with John Stanton, of "America's Nightmare: The Presidency of George Bush II."

Whoa! If he is a respected journalist in the eyes of the DU, then I personally wouldn't trust a thing he writes. DU is a spawning ground for all kinds of bizarre and hateful conspiracy theories, and I see that this guy is a serious advocate of them. He evidently believes all of the going junk, that Bush knew about 9/11, fixed the election (despite his opponent saying it wasn't - how they work that out in the conspiracy I'll never know), is part of a "blood cult" yadda yadda yadda. http://forums.filefront.com/images/s...rcastic%29.gif

Well Vonner, if you fall into the conspiracy theorist side of things...well...
I guess it would explain a lot wouldn't it?

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

*I'm just gonna move this over to the saloon with a ten foot poll (closest home for it)
[on topic]
@ queeg I do agree it is very RtCW like (and funny)
[/topic]
(probably the last post in this thread that will be on topic :/ )

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

I have tried several times submitting a reply but continue to get a 30 second fatal error..? Anyone of you know whats going on...?



Peace......... VONNER

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

thats odd dude, if you keep getting this, try posting in the general feedback section of GF (go to first link about all posts for main site and general feedback is second forum down). Good luck dude.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

@ Preacher:agreed

Operation: chicken man elimination is in effect-3458579-7832323-4678344-464649467-85767840-765925476768-4895696349-48975786236

Mwahahahaha:assimilate: :devil:

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

immature

adj 1: characteristic of a lack of maturity; "immature behavior" [ant: mature] 2: lacking in development; "immature plans"; "an unformed character" [syn: unformed] 3: (used of living things especially persons) in an early period of life or development or growth; "young people" [syn: young] [ant: old] 4: not fully developed or mature; not ripe; "unripe fruit"; "fried green tomatoes"; "green wood" [syn: green, unripe, unripened] [ant: ripe] 5: not yet mature [ant: mature] 6: (of birds) not yet having developed feathers; "a small unfledged sparrow on the window sill" [syn: unfledged] [ant: fledged]



ignorant

adj 1: lacking general education or knowledge; "an ignorant man"; "nescient of contemporary literature"; "an unlearned group incapable of understanding complex issues"; "exhibiting contempt for his unlettered companions" [syn: nescient, unenlightened, unlearned, unlettered] 2: ignorant of the fundamentals of a given art or branch of knowledge; "ignorant of quantum mechanics"; "musically illiterate" [syn: illiterate] 3: lacking basic knowledge; "how can someone that age be so ignorant?"; "inexperienced and new to the real world" [syn: inexperienced] 4: used of things; lacking sense or awareness; "ignorant hope"; "fine innocent weather" [syn: innocent] 5: lacking knowledge or skill; "unversed in the jargon of the social scientist" [syn: unversed] [ant: versed] 6: lacking information or knowledge; "an unknowledgeable assistant" [syn: unknowledgeable, unknowing, unwitting]

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Just youthful.:D

Didn't mean to hurt your feelers.
Just get tired of all the leftist, religious concealed, self serving, paranoid agenda. In the name of JESUS!
See enough of that on the evening news.

You have an opinion of your own, or do you just quote Michael Moore clones?
Did you look those words up yourself, or did Wayne Madsen help you?

Talk what you know my fine feathered friend. Get a mind of your own. If what you have displayed so far is the earmark of mature and intelligent, my 7 month old son must be a prodigy.

PS. I'm done here. This doesn't belong in GF IMO. If you would like to take this to another level, my e-mail, and IM ID is in my profile. I'd even be happy to give you my phone #, address or whatever. I love to debate (especially real issues with someone who knows their stuff and not someone else's). Or we could just insult each other. I have a razor sharp tongue, also. Although, as I said before I'm not accustomed to having a battle of the wits with an unarmed person. Anyway, my apologies to everyone else for whitnessing the ugliness. I just feel the need to cut the head off liberalism wherever it rears it's ugly head.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Considering people who criticize Bush as immature is pretty representative of a certain design of totalitarism.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

I've had some LARGE lag over the past few days... I think they must be doing some server maintenance.

RE: All

HEH - we sure have a more vocal bunch than we did in 2003!

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

LOl QUEEG . look what ya have done to dave ..:eek: how did BUSH get into that University...Not evil but not really bright as well over..1 million iraq dead .over 1,000 usmc dead. Uk NL .No atomic weapons of mass destruction , was the fact :deal: NL left after 2 dead .. aussies taken there spots so we have been dragged into full steam now .. it was .First our elite S.A.S .....next country Iran, korea ????:confused: was funny but QUEEG Did look like RTCW begining .4 that well done :lol: such is life i am out , what would i now iam Australian ,Iam out of this 1 now :smokin:

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Sorry, just one last point I feel I have to make. Some of you call Bush evil, unintelligent. Maybe you should place the focus where it needs to be. I'll tell you what evil is... People who kidnap innocent civilians who are simply trying to support their families, put them in front of a camera and broadcast accross the internet, then hack off their heads with a machete. I can think of NOTHING more disgusting and heinous.

A leader who slaughters over 3,000 people (shiite) in one town alone, because they share a different religious view.

A leader who operates torture chambers, places people in meat grinders, and intimidates detainees by going after their families.

Lest we forget, Saddam VIOLATED A UN AGREEMENT. Whether or not he has any WOMD, he violated an agreement that outlined very specific actions if that agreement was in breech, which was not dealt with for 10 years. Yes, we used that as an excuse to dethrone a digusting excuse of a human being. A complete waste of flesh. Britain was the one of the very few countries who had the genitalia to stand with us and enforce their own agreement.

Some things the media seems to ignore- There are schools being built for the children. The Iraqi people are finally getting money from their own oil (we sure as hell aren't, gas is at an all time high). Iraqis got to vote, most for the first time ever. Many soldiers who have come home are disgusted because the media(liberal) only shows the aspects that put our own soldiers and country in a negative light. They ignore all the good that is being done. And, lest we forget, all this is above and beyond the scope of the military. Military was originally designed for one purpose-to kill the enemy. NOT to hand out candy bars.

So for all of you that are anti-Bush and anti-Iraqi involvement and maybe believe we should have just stood by ignoring what was happening, maybe you would have liked an all German-speaking Europe. Saddam was not unlike Hitler (maybe you are a nazi and a pinko-commie). There was a pussification that happened to the U.S. after WWII. We used to kick ass and take names, and not take crap from anyone. Now all the liberals want us to do is hand out candybars. I think it is sad.

Sorry, I get tired of all the anger being directed at, what I consider to be, the wrong direction. I PROMISE I won't write any more on this in this thread. I just feel some shoot their mouth off without thinking things through thoroughly and this makes me angry. We have lost a lot of good people in this cause, and it makes me angry when ignorant asses try to diminish their sacrifice and the good they have done.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

When we're talking about Bush, why should we place the focus somewhere else? I call this drowning the fish.

Indeed, this is disgusting. So let's stop thinking when we see this. Or at least, let's not think about what (who) made them do this. It could generate very disturbing questions.

A leader placed and protected by who? :rolleyes:

A leader placed and protected by who? :rolleyes:

So US could follow a UN rule? How curious...
Weren't the WMDs the so-called reason used by Bush to invade Iraq?

:agreed

Jesus...If I had only $1 each time I heard anti-Bush = liberal in this forum, I would be soooooo rich... :rolleyes: Can't you figure there is not only liberal in the world?

How sad. It's a pretty good entertainment.
Weren't be send to fight the terrorism? Then let them find Bin Laden, for a change... Oh wait, he's not the Bush's top priority anymore...How sad for the people who died for nothing in NY.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Why don't you answer your own questions?
You seem to be very quick, in this and other threads with your sarcasm but lack of intelligent reply.
maybe you should be asking yourself these questions.
Do you speak German???
Nazi

I'm happy you find my posts entertaining.
I've noticed your posts really changed since your big promotion in cyber land as a moderator.
Biggus Dickus is obviously referring to your personality and not your endowment.

Since you're such a fucking genious, why don't you enlighten me.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

I was referring to where your anger should be focused. Bush is not where this began.

stop thinking? You seem to be doing a good job of that. No one MADE them do this. They were already capable of this kind of action. They have simply been flushed out. Do you really think they would never have done anything like this had we not invaded. You're a moron if you believe so.

Very true. Placed by the U.S. (not Bush) years ago. Also, Bin Laden was trained by our own CIA since we're on the subject. At this point the focus should be on what to do about them.


same as above

An agreement (a contract) made between Saddam and the UN. Saddam has been in violation of that for 13 years and up until now, everyone's been too frikin weak to enforce it. Bush just has the backbone no one else seems to have to do the right thing no matter what spineless political meatpuppets think.

No. If you were paying attention. The reason we invaded was because he violated the UN agreement HE made that would allow the UN to inspect his weapons facilities. Since he would not allow the UN to conduct insepctions, what other conclusion is logical. That maybe he is doing what he shouldn't. Whether or not he HAD WOMD, he was not allowing inspections. THAT violated the agreement. He was allowed to get away with this for 13 years. Bush finally stepped up to the plate and responded.


Yeah what.


Your views are definitely liberal (and uneducated). maybe you should take a break from the gaming world and try reading a book or something.


We are fighting terrorism. I believe someone who operates torture chambers a terrorist. You (nor I) truly know what the military is up to. Maybe they know where he is and gathering intelligence. Who really knows. I guarantee he is a priority. I'm not sure why Bush seems to get the blame for 911. Maybe we should reflect on history and consider maybe the other European countries(not Hitler) was to blame for the persecution of the Jews. Their complacency and pompous inactivity allowed Hitler to grow into a force to be reckoned with. Lastly, keep your **** mouth shut about 911. You know nothing about it and you have no right to make reference to it you piece of s***. Those people did not die for nothing. I wish to God I could meet you face to face. I would hang you by your own entrails for that remark.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

The Warnings of History




by Thom Hartmann

This weekend - February 27th - is the 72nd anniversary, but the corporate media most likely won't cover it. The generation that experienced this history firsthand is now largely dead, and only a few of us dare hear their ghosts.


It started when the government, in the midst of an economic crisis, received reports of an imminent terrorist attack. A foreign ideologue had launched feeble attacks on a few famous buildings, but the media largely ignored his relatively small efforts. The intelligence services knew, however, that the odds were he would eventually succeed. (Historians are still arguing whether or not rogue elements in the intelligence service helped the terrorist. Some, like Sefton Delmer - a London Daily Express reporter on the scene - say they certainly did not, while others, like William Shirer, suggest they did.)


But the warnings of investigators were ignored at the highest levels, in part because the government was distracted; the man who claimed to be the nation's leader had not been elected by a majority vote and the majority of citizens claimed he had no right to the powers he coveted.


He was a simpleton, some said, a cartoon character of a man who saw things in black-and-white terms and didn't have the intellect to understand the subtleties of running a nation in a complex and internationalist world.
His coarse use of language - reflecting his political roots in a southernmost state - and his simplistic and often-inflammatory nationalistic rhetoric offended the aristocrats, foreign leaders, and the well-educated elite in the government and media. And, as a young man, he'd joined a secret society with an occult-sounding name and bizarre initiation rituals that involved skulls and human bones.


Nonetheless, he knew the terrorist was going to strike (although he didn't know where or when), and he had already considered his response. When an aide brought him word that the nation's most prestigious building was ablaze, he verified it was the terrorist who had struck and then rushed to the scene and called a press conference.


"You are now witnessing the beginning of a great epoch in history," he proclaimed, standing in front of the burned-out building, surrounded by national media. "This fire," he said, his voice trembling with emotion, "is the beginning." He used the occasion - "a sign from God," he called it - to declare an all-out war on terrorism and its ideological sponsors, a people, he said, who traced their origins to the Middle East and found motivation for their evil deeds in their religion.


Two weeks later, the first detention center for terrorists was built in Oranianberg to hold the first suspected allies of the infamous terrorist. In a national outburst of patriotism, the leader's flag was everywhere, even printed large in newspapers suitable for window display.


Within four weeks of the terrorist attack, the nation's now-popular leader had pushed through legislation - in the name of combating terrorism and fighting the philosophy he said spawned it - that suspended constitutional guarantees of free speech, privacy, and habeas corpus. Police could now intercept mail and wiretap phones; suspected terrorists could be imprisoned without specific charges and without access to their lawyers; police could sneak into people's homes without warrants if the cases involved terrorism.


To get his patriotic "Decree on the Protection of People and State" passed over the objections of concerned legislators and civil libertarians, he agreed to put a 4-year sunset provision on it: if the national emergency provoked by the terrorist attack was over by then, the freedoms and rights would be returned to the people, and the police agencies would be re-restrained. Legislators would later say they hadn't had time to read the bill before voting on it.


Immediately after passage of the anti-terrorism act, his federal police agencies stepped up their program of arresting suspicious persons and holding them without access to lawyers or courts. In the first year only a few hundred were interred, and those who objected were largely ignored by the mainstream press, which was afraid to offend and thus lose access to a leader with such high popularity ratings. Citizens who protested the leader in public - and there were many - quickly found themselves confronting the newly empowered police's batons, gas, and jail cells, or fenced off in protest zones safely out of earshot of the leader's public speeches. (In the meantime, he was taking almost daily lessons in public speaking, learning to control his tonality, gestures, and facial expressions. He became a very competent orator.)


Within the first months after that terrorist attack, at the suggestion of a political advisor, he brought a formerly obscure word into common usage. He wanted to stir a "racial pride" among his countrymen, so, instead of referring to the nation by its name, he began to refer to it as "The Homeland," a phrase publicly promoted in the introduction to a 1934 speech recorded in Leni Riefenstahl's famous propaganda movie "Triumph Of The Will." As hoped, people's hearts swelled with pride, and the beginning of an us-versus-them mentality was sewn. Our land was "the" homeland, citizens thought: all others were simply foreign lands. We are the "true people," he suggested, the only ones worthy of our nation's concern; if bombs fall on others, or human rights are violated in other nations and it makes our lives better, it's of little concern to us.


Playing on this new implicitly racial nationalism, and exploiting a disagreement with the French over his increasing militarism, he argued that any international body that didn't act first and foremost in the best interest of his own nation was neither relevant nor useful. He thus withdrew his country from the League Of Nations in October, 1933, and then negotiated a separate naval armaments agreement with Anthony Eden of The United Kingdom to create a worldwide military ruling elite.


His propaganda minister orchestrated a campaign to ensure the people that he was a deeply religious man and that his motivations were rooted in Christianity. He even proclaimed the need for a revival of the Christian faith across his nation, what he called a "New Christianity." Every man in his rapidly growing army wore a belt buckle that declared "Gott Mit Uns" - God Is With Us - and most of them fervently believed it was true.


Within a year of the terrorist attack, the nation's leader determined that the various local police and federal agencies around the nation were lacking the clear communication and overall coordinated administration necessary to deal with the terrorist threat facing the nation, particularly those citizens who were of Middle Eastern ancestry and thus probably terrorist and communist sympathizers, and various troublesome "intellectuals" and "liberals." He proposed a single new national agency to protect the security of the homeland, consolidating the actions of dozens of previously independent police, border, and investigative agencies under a single leader.


He appointed one of his most trusted associates to be leader of this new agency, the Central Security Office for the homeland, and gave it a role in the government equal to the other major departments.


His assistant who dealt with the press noted that, since the terrorist attack, "Radio and press are at out disposal." Those voices questioning the legitimacy of their nation's leader, or raising questions about his checkered past, had by now faded from the public's recollection as his central security office began advertising a program encouraging people to phone in tips about suspicious neighbors. This program was so successful that the names of some of the people "denounced" were soon being broadcast on radio stations. Those denounced often included opposition politicians and news reporters who dared speak out - a favorite target of his regime and the media he now controlled through intimidation and ownership by corporate allies.


To consolidate his power, he concluded that government alone wasn't enough. He reached out to industry and forged an alliance, bringing former executives of the nation's largest corporations into high government positions. A flood of government money poured into corporate coffers to fight the war against the Middle Eastern ancestry terrorists lurking within the homeland, and to prepare for wars overseas. He encouraged large corporations friendly to him to acquire media outlets and other industrial concerns across the nation, particularly those previously owned by suspicious people of Middle Eastern ancestry. He built powerful alliances with industry; one corporate ally got the lucrative contract worth millions to build the first large-scale detention center for enemies of the state. Soon more would follow. Industry flourished.


He also reached out to the churches, declaring that the nation had clear Christian roots, that any nation that didn't openly support religion was morally bankrupt, and that his administration would openly and proudly provide both moral and financial support to initiatives based on faith to provide social services.
In this, he was reaching back to his own embrace of Christianity, which he noted in an April 12, 1922 speech:



"My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers ... was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter.


"In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders...


"As a Christian ... I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice..."


When he later survived an assassination attempt, he said, "Now I am completely content. The fact that I left the Burgerbraukeller earlier than usual is a corroboration of Providence's intention to let me reach my goal."


Many government functions started with prayer. Every school day started with prayer and every child heard the wonders of Christianity and - especially - the Ten Commandments in school. The leader even ended many of his speeches with a prayer, as he did in a February 20, 1938 speech before Parliament:


"In this hour I would ask of the Lord God only this: that, as in the past, so in the years to come He would give His blessing to our work and our action, to our judgment and our resolution, that He will safeguard us from all false pride and from all cowardly servility, that He may grant us to find the straight path which His Providence has ordained for the German people, and that He may ever give us the courage to do the right, never to falter, never to yield before any violence, before any danger."
But after an interval of peace following the terrorist attack, voices of dissent again arose within and without the government. Students had started an active program opposing him (later known as the White Rose Society), and leaders of nearby nations were speaking out against his bellicose rhetoric. He needed a diversion, something to direct people away from the corporate cronyism being exposed in his own government, questions of his possibly illegitimate rise to power, his corruption of religious leaders, and the oft-voiced concerns of civil libertarians about the people being held in detention without due process or access to attorneys or family.


With his number two man - a master at manipulating the media - he began a campaign to convince the people of the nation that a small, limited war was necessary. Another nation was harboring many of the suspicious Middle Eastern people, and even though its connection with the terrorist who had set afire the nation's most important building was tenuous at best, it held resources their nation badly needed if they were to have room to live and maintain their prosperity.


He called a press conference and publicly delivered an ultimatum to the leader of the other nation, provoking an international uproar. He claimed the right to strike preemptively in self-defense, and nations across Europe - at first - denounced him for it, pointing out that it was a doctrine only claimed in the past by nations seeking worldwide empire, like Caesar's Rome or Alexander's Greece.


It took a few months, and intense international debate and lobbying with European nations, but, after he personally met with the leader of the United Kingdom, finally a deal was struck. After the military action began, Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain told the nervous British people that giving in to this leader's new first-strike doctrine would bring "peace for our time." Thus Hitler annexed Austria in a lightning move, riding a wave of popular support as leaders so often do in times of war. The Austrian government was unseated and replaced by a new leadership friendly to Germany, and German corporations began to take over Austrian resources.


In a speech responding to critics of the invasion, Hitler said, "Certain foreign newspapers have said that we fell on Austria with brutal methods. I can only say; even in death they cannot stop lying. I have in the course of my political struggle won much love from my people, but when I crossed the former frontier [into Austria] there met me such a stream of love as I have never experienced. Not as tyrants have we come, but as liberators."


To deal with those who dissented from his policies, at the advice of his politically savvy advisors, he and his handmaidens in the press began a campaign to equate him and his policies with patriotism and the nation itself. National unity was essential, they said, to ensure that the terrorists or their sponsors didn't think they'd succeeded in splitting the nation or weakening its will.


Rather than the government being run by multiple parties in a pluralistic, democratic fashion, one single party sought total control. Emulating a technique also used by Stalin, but as ancient as Rome, the Party used the power of its influence on the government to take over all government functions, hand out government favors, and reward Party contributors with government positions and contracts.


In times of war, they said, there could be only "one people, one nation, and one commander-in-chief" ("Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer"), and so his advocates in the media began a nationwide campaign charging that critics of his policies were attacking the nation itself. You were either with us, or you were with the terrorists.


It was a simplistic perspective, but that was what would work, he was told by his Propaganda Minister, Joseph Goebbels: "The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over."


Those questioning him were labeled "anti-German" or "not good Germans," and it was suggested they were aiding the enemies of the state by failing in the patriotic necessity of supporting the nation's valiant men in uniform. It was one of his most effective ways to stifle dissent and pit wage-earning people (from whom most of the army came) against the "intellectuals and liberals" who were critical of his policies.


Another technique was to "manufacture news," through the use of paid shills posing as reporters, seducing real reporters with promises of access to the leader in exchange for favorable coverage, and thinly veiled threats to those who exposed his lies. As his Propaganda Minister said, "It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation of public opinion."


Nonetheless, once the "small war" annexation of Austria was successfully and quickly completed, and peace returned, voices of opposition were again raised in the Homeland. The almost-daily release of news bulletins about the dangers of terrorist communist cells wasn't enough to rouse the populace and totally suppress dissent. A full-out war was necessary to divert public attention from the growing rumbles within the country about disappearing dissidents; violence against liberals, Jews, and union leaders; and the epidemic of crony capitalism that was producing empires of wealth in the corporate sector but threatening the middle class's way of life.


A year later, to the week, Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia.


In the months after that, he claimed that Poland had weapons of mass destruction (poison gas) and was supporting terrorists against Germany. Those who doubted that Poland represented a threat were shouted down or branded as ignorant. Elections were rigged, run by party hacks. Only loyal Party members were given passes for admission to public events with the leader, so there would never be a single newsreel of a heckler, and no doubt in the minds of the people that the leader enjoyed vast support.


And his support did grow, as Propaganda Minister Goebbels' dictum bore fruit:


"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
Within a few months Poland, too, was invaded in a "defensive, pre-emptive" action. The nation was now fully at war, and all internal dissent was suppressed in the name of national security; it was the end of Germany's first experiment with democracy.


As we conclude this review of history, there are a few milestones worth remembering.


February 27, 2005, is the 72nd anniversary of Dutch terrorist Marinus van der Lubbe's successful firebombing of the German Parliament (Reichstag) building, the terrorist act that catapulted Hitler to legitimacy and reshaped the German constitution. By the time of his successful and brief action to seize Austria, in which almost no German blood was shed, Hitler was the most beloved and popular leader in the history of his nation. Hailed around the world, he was later Time magazine's "Man Of The Year."


Most Americans remember his office for the security of the homeland, known as the Reichssicherheitshauptamt and its SchutzStaffel, simply by its most famous agency's initials: the SS.


We also remember that the Germans developed a new form of highly violent warfare they named "lightning war" or blitzkrieg, which, while generating devastating civilian losses, also produced a highly desirable "shock and awe" among the nation's leadership according to the authors of the 1996 book "Shock And Awe" published by the National Defense University Press.


Reflecting on that time, The American Heritage Dictionary (Houghton Mifflin Company, 1983) left us this definition of the form of government the German democracy had become through Hitler's close alliance with the largest German corporations and his policy of using religion and war as tools to keep power: "fas-cism (fâsh'iz'em) n. A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism."


Today, as we face financial and political crises, it's useful to remember that the ravages of the Great Depression hit Germany and the United States alike. Through the 1930s, however, Hitler and Roosevelt chose very different courses to bring their nations back to power and prosperity.


Germany's response was to use government to empower corporations and reward the society's richest individuals, privatize much of the commons, stifle dissent, strip people of constitutional rights, bust up unions, and create an illusion of prosperity through government debt and continual and ever-expanding war spending.
America passed minimum wage laws to raise the middle class, enforced anti-trust laws to diminish the power of corporations, increased taxes on corporations and the wealthiest individuals, created Social Security, and became the employer of last resort through programs to build national infrastructure, promote the arts, and replant forests.


To the extent that our Constitution is still intact, the choice is again ours.



The bush administration sure resembles a regime that I would consider the most horrific in the worlds History ……


Peace……….. VONNER

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Once again, quotes from the conspiracy theorist. Do you have any words of your own. If Bush's "regime" is horrific, what was Saddam's...North Korea?
If this is such a bad place to live, then get out. I know I would leave if I thought my government was under a "horrific regime". Nothing keeping you here. Maybe you could go live with Biggus Dickheadus.

I bet your windows are foiled, you drink your own urine and your news comes from Dan Rather.

What a quack (er, oh I mean cluck)

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Why are you such an angry person…? Why do you attack with name calling and express ignorance instead of intelligence? You seem to be an educated person. I would advise you to act like one. Why is it that republicans always attack in such an angry manner …?

Cornholio, I don’t believe you even read this article. I guess us Nazis and so called Pinkos you want to call us can feel affirmed with our beliefs of Bush and his Regime… Because your actions of anger coincides with how a defendant acts when the prosecutor reveals evidence of Guilt.



Peace……………… VONNER

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

I absolutely am an angry person by nature (also, I quit smoking yesterday). You are also correct about my being educated. Everything I have said has been my own words. I have yet to quote antone. Not to say I don't read other's opinions (conservative and liberal), but I choose to express only mine. Maybe you are percieving what you most associate with.

@ the way republicans and pinkos act- I think it's quite notable and no secret the differences. Let's take the most recent events: The democratic/republican conventions. There were no invasions, intrusions, or wild protests in or outside the democratic convention. We can't say the same for the latter can we?

One of the reasons I get angry is the libs can't seem to keep to themselves. I believe the first post off topic in this thread was a Bush bash.

In the end, you are right about one thing; my anger, my inner nature or not, does allude to an air of defensiveness. This will just keep going in circles, and will get angrier because this is something I believe very strongly ablut. I am a Patriot. I think the wise thing would be to end this discussion, although I'm sure Biggus will return to "plink plink" add his 2 cents to try to stir things up. Well, we'll see.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

The easiest way to prove Bush was right is too look at the last election. Bush gave Kerry a thumping and also the repubs picked up more house and senate seats. This shows that the majority of US citizens are conservative/moderate thinkers and that liberalism is a dying breed. Quote Mike Moore, Thom Hartmann or what ever other lefties are out there but they as mentioned are a dying breed.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Good luck Deacon coming of the cancer sticks . now there r evil buggers... I hope your angryness wasn,t vented at any of my remarks.. If so sorry..... religion and politics doest work in G/f . I believe good freinds are the losers ...DAVE BITE_ME .I have alot of respect for like wise your self ... i dont want this topic to spoil any freindships

sincerly Deadeye Ian

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Ian Nope dosnt spoil any thing here. People have their opinions and its ok to show them. No one on this subject will see things from both sides. So all it will show is hardened positions. This post should be closed due to we went through all of this crap in a gazillion threads in and out of the WW forum back in pre Nov 2004 and I think it has been talked to death.

I am a conservative republican and have backed Reagan, Bush I, Bush II and this will never change. I have cringed at the likes of Carter and Clinton and feel they hurt my country in ways I can't even begin to express. Hence I will always defend the persident I belive in so posts like this should not be here.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

R.E.T.H.O.R.I.C.A.L.
:uhoh:
I would...But what questions?

No, but I would like it, it's a beautiful language.

So for you German = Nazi? :thatsgreat: I won't even dignify this with a reply.

Considering your statement above, entertaining is maybe not the most appropriate word, but it's the closest.

I'm glad you feels so concerned for me.

You have obviously no idea to what this name is referring to. So I'll give you a little hint: :google:

It would be a hard job and I miss time.

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

Ok time to lighten up this thread with some good jokes.....

http://www.i-hate-liberals.com/images/aclu.gif

Re: A new MOD - Castle Bushenstein
 

My anger? I'm perfectly calm. Unlike you.



See what I mean?
By who? By what? Why? You only consider the effect, not the cause.
No, I don't think it's only about the invasion. The 10 years embargo didn't make them your best friends too.

About Bin Laden? :lol:

How could I be Nazi and liberal at the same time? Don't reply, you're utterly wrong on both count. The pro-Bush speech is always the same about the anti-Bush: anti-Bush are liberals (or Nazi, I just discovered it today, thanks)
Sorry, but it just makes me laugh.

Nazis don't read books, they burn them. You should know it.

Neither Bush.
Are you the current president of USA? Because the current president of USA clearly said:
1/ Bin Laden is not a priority in his war against terrorism
2/ There were no WMD in Iraq
So the current president of USA guarantee nothing. It's enough for me.

No smoke without fire. Oh wait, I forgot the world is full of Nazi liberals. That's surely the reason.

Weren't you talking about a "focus" :lol: :rofl:

Oops! Too late, I did it already. :clueless:

They did die for nothing, because Bush promised them and their families that he will punish the responsible of the 9/11, and he did (and will never do) nothing. Face it. He lied. As usual.

Stop it, you're exciting me. You'd better pray your god to meet Bush for a sincere explanation (that you'll never have).
Just a last question: Are you able to post without threatening and insulting people who doesn't have the same views as you? Because if you can't, you should avoid the public forums. Just an advice. You just makes yourself look as a fool.