| Register | FAQ | Forum Wiki | Gallery | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||||||
| Crysis General Discussion Discuss anything related to Crysis here! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| |||
| Quote:
Also, i dont think admins deserve special treatment, they are here to police the forums, not to be gods in it |
| ||||
| I have no clue where you get your information.... Did you just completely overlook TigerDirect's tests on the 9800gtx? and resolution DOES affect performance, Try running Crysis on a lower resolution then on your monitor's max supported...THERE WILL BE A DIFFERENCE...but since you seem to be oblivious to everything we are saying....you probably wont notice anything. Since my new rig that i am making is going to quash yours anyway...I'll forgive your lack of intelligence. HAVE A NICE DAY Edit: An actual Screenshot of the Crysis Demo ![]() Spoiler: Last edited by DarkKrucifix7 : May 24th, 2008 at 06:31 PM. |
| |||
| Quote:
And rendering more pixels, means more for the GPU to do, and so lower frame rate Ive uploaded 2 screens running crysis at High DX9, one at 800*480, other at 1440*900, which is 3.4 times the size, and runs 2.5 times slower Quote:
Look at http://www.projectoffset.com/media/g4tv.wmv, to me, those graphics look better than crysis, and were recorded in realtime back in 2005 (before they had the 8 series..) A good example of bad optimizations is the shadows, they work fine in other games, but yet dont look that good in crysis and run like crap (DX9 mode) |
| ||||
| Quote:
Also tested on my 6600, only 5FPS difference between max and minimum @Weesals, crytek have stated in VARIOUS podcasts that they wanted to PUSH GPUs, so the games controlled the market and how far games could advance, and not the hardware, why let, hardware, control video game advancement, its stupid, and pointless And no, Project Offset gfx remind me of Oblivon only newer, they are in no way better then Crysis, even on lowest Shadows look mad pro in Crysis, they are actually high res and actually look believable, unlike shadows of former games like bf2 and such were they are hell blocky.
__________________ Personal opinions are not endorsed by FileFront Company of Heroes Staff | SoaSE Files Admin |
| ||||
| I used to play on Very High, and now I'm using the "ultra high config." I'm playing on a 2.8Ghz C2D, OC'd 8800GT, and 2Gb of RAM. The overclocking really made the difference, imo, to be able on that high of a setting. Of course, my resolution is only 1280x1024. ![]()
__________________ |
| ||||
| You're lucky. I'd play it on high on 800x600 without complaints, if it wasn't because anything below 1680x1050 on my monitor looks like AntiAliasing's worst enemy.
__________________ ![]() "Don't cry because its over, Smile because it happened!" |
| ||||
| There's nothing wrong with doing it like that... in fact that's how I play Oblivion, maxed out on all settings but running 640x. The 280GTX just came out. I read a Maximum PC benchmark and the prototype GT did I think 38 FPS [all settings maxed, 1920x res] whereas the the 9800XT did about 27. I do recall though the 3870X2 did better, around 40 FPS. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0