Re: What do u think should be in the next COD game?
 

Every single battle through W.W. 2 played through in chronological order, AND you play as every force (German, British, American, Russian, ect.)

Get that, then I'm good.

Re: What do u think should be in the next COD game?
 

gotta have tanks, more maps from Battle of the Bulge like Foy, Hurtgen, Noville, Bastogne... marketgarden/holland maps

Omaha beaches, Utah Beaches (USA) Juno , gold & sword (British); maps.

italy maps like Anzio, Monte Cassino including Leopold cannons that you must disable also nicknamed "anzio anne"

Japan maps/sp campaign

the option to create ur own skin using the selection of ranks 4* general - Recruit on ur player skin, any unit patch that you want on ur skin, and that would stay with you on any server.

shermans, tigers, panzers, Jeeps, 50 cals, 30 cals, halftracks, supply trucks, medics, bazookas.

choose single player campaign for american between Paratrooper or Infantry or Tank Crew member. so that way u can divide the missions acordingly

Paratroopers: Would go B.E.L. on dday, and be dropped into holland and fight threw belguim and germany on the rhine. drop into japan somewhere

Infantry: fight on dday, and in italy and japan southern france

Tank Crews: north africa, dday, japan (including the tank that shoots like a flamethrower)

Re: What do u think should be in the next COD game?
 

The allied forces didn't make it to fight in Japan. . . (Okinawa doesn't count) But all of teh variants of the Sherman would be awesome. Have some awesome Pacific maps and missions would be awesome. MOHPA was alright, but lacked a bit, and I think it was Australians. . .

Hawk.

Re: What do u think should be in the next COD game?
 

Qoted from #12, "Omaha beaches, Utah Beaches (USA) Juno , gold & sword (British); maps."

Juno was CANADIAN, and I am very gratefull that IW(or whoever is making CoD3) decided to put in a CANADIAN campaign. It's time that we CANADIANS are finnaly getting some cred in the states, because playinly put, without our efforts, and outstanding fighting force, you guys would have been torn to shreds long before your little boats got within a mile from shore.
By the way, I'm talking Dieppe here people, the only reason why D-day was so damn succesfull was because more than 70% of troops that landed that day were killed, and another 10% were captured.

Re: What do u think should be in the next COD game?
 

Sound to me like you're describing Battlefield 1942. That's what I like about CoD, you're not some kind of "super soldier" that can drive tanks, halftracks, jeeps, and fly planes. CoD is all about infantry tactics and if you really need vehicles go play BF.

Re: What do u think should be in the next COD game?
 

I want REALISM!!!! Not to start any flames, but multiplayer is definatly a battle of the whores. There should be weapon limitations in because everyone is either using the mp44, a sniper rifle, or that damn shotgun.

Re: What do u think should be in the next COD game?
 

Most of this has probably already been said, but heck here's my list:
- all important WWII battles in chronologic order with a consistant and relevant storyline (play as Germans too for a change)
- more realistic AI squad mates and such...
- bigger maps and events - like for example battles between entire divisions with artillery, air support, armor, infantry fighting eachother with real tactics and of course chaotic battles, Pointe du Hoc- and Hill 400-like
- vehicles (don't have to drive all of them but be machine gunner on a jeep or half track or something)
- get rid of those stupid briefings in between the missions, let a commander or something say what you got to do, while you are playing
- bayonets, mines, flamethrowers, field phones, portable mortars and machine guns, grenades the old-fashioned way (like in CoD1 where you have to select a grenade to throw it) and panzerfausts back

This is just for singleplayer mission, multiplayer-wise I'm sure all this can be arranged ;) isn't that right Filefront?