FileFront Forums

FileFront Forums (http://forums.filefront.com/)
-   Battlefield 1942 General Yib-Yab (Off Topic) (http://forums.filefront.com/battlefield-1942-general-discussion-219/)
-   -   Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts. (http://forums.filefront.com/battlefield-1942-general-discussion/109109-bf1942-1-6-patch-suck-nuts.html)

residentevil333 February 3rd, 2004 11:34 AM

Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
For one i hate punkbuster. I dont cheat but i hate it cuss it always causes more problems then it fixes, and i am right cuss now i lagg like crazy and jerk like crazy and alot of servers. It isnt my computer it isnt slow at all. Heck 4 other games ihave that have punkbuster on them have problems because of it. Thier werent many cheaters on this gamer to start with anyway just to many people bitching about how good someone is and thinking they cheat. I still 40+ kills and 1 death on aberdeen and now we have punkbuster.

Specs (it isnt my overclocking cuss iv tried stock as well its punkbuster)

Athlon xp 2500+ @ 2.5ghz
1gb pc3200 Samsung
Abit NF7-S rev 2.0
Ati 9700pro

Also this patch is so freakin dumb cuss now the sherman tank's are wayyyy stronger then the german Panzer tanks. The tigers are so weak now. I mean i just got off aberdeen my fav map so furius that it only takes 2 shots for a sherman to kill me even from long distances and getting hit i nthe front. The M10 takes only 1 shot.

Panzers take forever to kill anything now. I got 5 good shot on sherman i nthe side and every time i do that no one is smoking at all.

For god sakes why cant you people who make these patchs leave some things alone. German tanks were never weaker in the war then the american tanks. Now... sherman cut through them like a hot knife of butter. It should be the opisit way.

Oh well for this im not buying the Vietnam game nore am i playing this stupide game anymore. Heck i had 6 people on the EA aberdeen server who agrred with me. Now u can imagine thier are plenty more.:furious: :furious: :furious:

Parakleet-TAKE LUCK February 3rd, 2004 11:58 AM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
As far as change to the game all I can say is, To each his own.

As far as PB your computer is pretty good from your specs.
But it must be your computer or your connection.
I only play PB enabled servers and have not experienced any of the problems that I was warned about.
I dont have quite as good a setup as you and I have not seen any reduction in FPS or quality.

Maybe my conection is better??
But I dont know for certain if that makes a difference.

With your specs PB should be fine so it must be your Computer or your connection.

Busta Cappa February 3rd, 2004 12:47 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
Works fine for me

Mihail February 3rd, 2004 12:56 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
I don't have any lag or slow downs due to the map, but the only thing I hate about 1.6 is the CONSTANT VOTING BY NEWBIES I mean every 2 mins theres a new vote for either to kick someone or a new map, I think there should really time limit between new votes

Gamefreak February 3rd, 2004 01:09 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by residentevil333
For one i hate punkbuster. I dont cheat but i hate it cuss it always causes more problems then it fixes, and i am right cuss now i lagg like crazy and jerk like crazy and alot of servers. It isnt my computer it isnt slow at all. Heck 4 other games ihave that have punkbuster on them have problems because of it. Thier werent many cheaters on this gamer to start with anyway just to many people bitching about how good someone is and thinking they cheat. I still 40+ kills and 1 death on aberdeen and now we have punkbuster.

Specs (it isnt my overclocking cuss iv tried stock as well its punkbuster)

Athlon xp 2500+ @ 2.5ghz
1gb pc3200 Samsung
Abit NF7-S rev 2.0
Ati 9700pro

Also this patch is so freakin dumb cuss now the sherman tank's are wayyyy stronger then the german Panzer tanks. The tigers are so weak now. I mean i just got off aberdeen my fav map so furius that it only takes 2 shots for a sherman to kill me even from long distances and getting hit i nthe front. The M10 takes only 1 shot.

Panzers take forever to kill anything now. I got 5 good shot on sherman i nthe side and every time i do that no one is smoking at all.

For god sakes why cant you people who make these patchs leave some things alone. German tanks were never weaker in the war then the american tanks. Now... sherman cut through them like a hot knife of butter. It should be the opisit way.

Oh well for this im not buying the Vietnam game nore am i playing this stupide game anymore. Heck i had 6 people on the EA aberdeen server who agrred with me. Now u can imagine thier are plenty more.:furious: :furious: :furious:



amen dude! i got so pissed when i heared that they were adding punkbuster, i have no problem with punkbuster in BF, luckly, but in all other games, punkbuster is always kicking me from servers! i join, 10 secounds later, punkbuster has an error, kick, i couldent play on any servers with punkbuster, punkbuster sucks!:thumbsdown:

monkey_dude12333 February 3rd, 2004 01:52 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by residentevil333
For one i hate punkbuster. I dont cheat but i hate it cuss it always causes more problems then it fixes, and i am right cuss now i lagg like crazy and jerk like crazy and alot of servers. It isnt my computer it isnt slow at all. Heck 4 other games ihave that have punkbuster on them have problems because of it. Thier werent many cheaters on this gamer to start with anyway just to many people bitching about how good someone is and thinking they cheat. I still 40+ kills and 1 death on aberdeen and now we have punkbuster.

Specs (it isnt my overclocking cuss iv tried stock as well its punkbuster)

Athlon xp 2500+ @ 2.5ghz
1gb pc3200 Samsung
Abit NF7-S rev 2.0
Ati 9700pro

Also this patch is so freakin dumb cuss now the sherman tank's are wayyyy stronger then the german Panzer tanks. The tigers are so weak now. I mean i just got off aberdeen my fav map so furius that it only takes 2 shots for a sherman to kill me even from long distances and getting hit i nthe front. The M10 takes only 1 shot.

Panzers take forever to kill anything now. I got 5 good shot on sherman i nthe side and every time i do that no one is smoking at all.

For god sakes why cant you people who make these patchs leave some things alone. German tanks were never weaker in the war then the american tanks. Now... sherman cut through them like a hot knife of butter. It should be the opisit way.

Oh well for this im not buying the Vietnam game nore am i playing this stupide game anymore. Heck i had 6 people on the EA aberdeen server who agrred with me. Now u can imagine thier are plenty more.:furious: :furious: :furious:

Yeah i highly doubt cause of 1 patch that a lot of people are going to quit battlefield and its obviously your computer or connection thats messed cause i have many friends and my clan who say that PB works extremly well and doesnt slow them down at all. Even if this patch is so bad in your opinion they're not gonna change it cause of you and they already have your money you idiot so shut the hell up and stop complaining.

residentevil333 February 3rd, 2004 01:52 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
Well i fixed my lagg issue, but still i think PB sucks. I also still dont like how they changed the hit points on the tanks. You all know as well as i that sherman are weak but fast tanks, Now thier strong and fast, and panzer is weak and slow.

It shouldnt be like that.


Oh i have a 3MB cable connection.

residentevil333 February 3rd, 2004 01:54 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by monkey_dude12333
Yeah i highly doubt cause of 1 patch that a lot of people are going to quit battlefield and its obviously your computer or connection thats messed cause i have many friends and my clan who say that PB works extremly well and doesnt slow them down at all. Even if this patch is so bad in your opinion they're not gonna change it cause of you and they already have your money you idiot so shut the hell up and stop complaining.

Bite me fudger.

Parakleet-TAKE LUCK February 3rd, 2004 01:56 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
What was the lag problem????

residentevil333 February 3rd, 2004 02:07 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
I tweaked PB just like i did with ET by typing in some commands.

UNDIESRULES February 3rd, 2004 02:37 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by monkey_dude12333
Yeah i highly doubt cause of 1 patch that a lot of people are going to quit battlefield and its obviously your computer or connection thats messed cause i have many friends and my clan who say that PB works extremly well and doesnt slow them down at all. Even if this patch is so bad in your opinion they're not gonna change it cause of you and they already have your money you idiot so shut the hell up and stop complaining.


OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHH hark at you ,ya bitch!!!lol

Jay7219 February 3rd, 2004 03:00 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
My game, and all of the mods run great! Played a server that I always get my ass kicked on and guess what!?!?!?! I didnt get my ass kicked, I had the most frags for 3 hours in a row. Thank the gods for punk buster. Maybe you are just having some pc configuration problems/conflicts. My rule of thumb as far as configuration and life goes .... KISS ..... Keep it Simple Stuiped. Works for me!!!

ApatcheAH64 February 3rd, 2004 03:17 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
i'm not one to talk because my computer is a slow piece of f**king sh!t, but it runs battlefield and tons of other games with the grapichcs juiced and not a glitch... wth? but n e ways, yes 1.6 does kind of suck, the new tricicle thing has sound but very low ummm the maps are gay, and ummm i hope 1.7 comes out soon.... thx fer readin

-ApatcheAH64

and btw i have a 1.3GHz 524MB Ram and an Nvidia GeForce 440mx/mx
as you are probly saying"bahaha what a slow piece of turd", but actually it suits me fine and i love it... lol //i dont really love it\\

ok bye

k4rl February 3rd, 2004 03:40 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
is that caen map all the patch has as a new feature? becoause if it is then his patch sucks ass

CamBo February 3rd, 2004 03:57 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
ok i hate this new patch also

but i dont think that it takes 1 shot from an m10 to blow up a tiger from the front or the pzr to get the side of a sherman 5 times and not make it smoke.

and yeah PB makes my gameplay choppy and i hate it.
my computer sucked enough without PB.
i dont think ive ever been in a game where someone was cheating.

bottom line
i hate this patch

monkey_dude12333 February 3rd, 2004 04:09 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by UNDIESRULES
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHH hark at you ,ya bitch!!!lol

oooo great comeback you fucking idiot i hope u and resident evil get hit by a train

CamBo February 3rd, 2004 04:14 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
now this patch is tearing apart friends :(

TheAnnihilator February 3rd, 2004 04:37 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
i'm here to stick up for the 1.6 patch, i dont find a single thing wrong with it...

ScOrPY February 3rd, 2004 10:59 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
I cant judge it till i get it.

Mihail February 4th, 2004 05:37 AM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
sherman tanks were pretty shitty tanks, they were very weak atleast compared to german and russian tanks, hell even britsh tanks like the church hill tank was better. I don't mind PB if you don't like it just disable it and don't go on any PB servers, problem sovled

wolf68k February 4th, 2004 06:01 AM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
I've seen a lot of people saying that punkbuster is the cause of all of their lag and gaming problems, and then they include their specs and so far no one that I've seen so far as specs weaker than mine:
AMD Thunderbird 900mhz
RAM 512megs PC133
GF4 MX440 SE
Win98 (non-SE)

I've run PB back when it came out on Q2, I was on a crappy 28.8k modem, and a much weaker system and there was no difference before or with PB.

Now I have this box and BF on a cable. No problems before PB and none with it.

If you have problems and want to blame it on PB, fine do. Cry, b*tch and moan all you want. But you do know you didn't have to install it all and still be able to play online.

The worst thing I can say about the 1.6 patch is, it seems the 1.5->1.6 patch is FUBAR some how in some way. So if you're going to update use the full 1.6 patch.

alex_gen February 4th, 2004 06:10 AM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
well i love this patch! new vehciles, maps, GUI, PB...all this for free?! quite moaning people EA/DICE dont have to continue making patches....they do it for free, get nothing from it. at least the game is being updated and modified, and i think with the added GUI scoreboard etc thingy makes it more enjoyable, oh and the Buddy thing, with that making it so much easier to add a buddy its so useful.

Mihail February 4th, 2004 08:31 AM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by alex_gen
well i love this patch! new vehciles, maps, GUI, PB...all this for free?! quite moaning people EA/DICE dont have to continue making patches....they do it for free, get nothing from it. at least the game is being updated and modified, and i think with the added GUI scoreboard etc thingy makes it more enjoyable, oh and the Buddy thing, with that making it so much easier to add a buddy its so useful.


I would not say they are doing it for free....... because making more patches causes normally more game stimulation for people to guy the game, more news that comes out about the game the more money they make. But i get your point


All times are GMT -7.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.