FileFront Forums

FileFront Forums (http://forums.filefront.com/)
-   Battlefield 1942 General Yib-Yab (Off Topic) (http://forums.filefront.com/battlefield-1942-general-discussion-219/)
-   -   Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts. (http://forums.filefront.com/battlefield-1942-general-discussion/109109-bf1942-1-6-patch-suck-nuts.html)

UNDIESRULES February 3rd, 2004 02:37 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by monkey_dude12333
Yeah i highly doubt cause of 1 patch that a lot of people are going to quit battlefield and its obviously your computer or connection thats messed cause i have many friends and my clan who say that PB works extremly well and doesnt slow them down at all. Even if this patch is so bad in your opinion they're not gonna change it cause of you and they already have your money you idiot so shut the hell up and stop complaining.


OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHH hark at you ,ya bitch!!!lol

Jay7219 February 3rd, 2004 03:00 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
My game, and all of the mods run great! Played a server that I always get my ass kicked on and guess what!?!?!?! I didnt get my ass kicked, I had the most frags for 3 hours in a row. Thank the gods for punk buster. Maybe you are just having some pc configuration problems/conflicts. My rule of thumb as far as configuration and life goes .... KISS ..... Keep it Simple Stuiped. Works for me!!!

ApatcheAH64 February 3rd, 2004 03:17 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
i'm not one to talk because my computer is a slow piece of f**king sh!t, but it runs battlefield and tons of other games with the grapichcs juiced and not a glitch... wth? but n e ways, yes 1.6 does kind of suck, the new tricicle thing has sound but very low ummm the maps are gay, and ummm i hope 1.7 comes out soon.... thx fer readin

-ApatcheAH64

and btw i have a 1.3GHz 524MB Ram and an Nvidia GeForce 440mx/mx
as you are probly saying"bahaha what a slow piece of turd", but actually it suits me fine and i love it... lol //i dont really love it\\

ok bye

k4rl February 3rd, 2004 03:40 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
is that caen map all the patch has as a new feature? becoause if it is then his patch sucks ass

CamBo February 3rd, 2004 03:57 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
ok i hate this new patch also

but i dont think that it takes 1 shot from an m10 to blow up a tiger from the front or the pzr to get the side of a sherman 5 times and not make it smoke.

and yeah PB makes my gameplay choppy and i hate it.
my computer sucked enough without PB.
i dont think ive ever been in a game where someone was cheating.

bottom line
i hate this patch

monkey_dude12333 February 3rd, 2004 04:09 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by UNDIESRULES
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHH hark at you ,ya bitch!!!lol

oooo great comeback you fucking idiot i hope u and resident evil get hit by a train

CamBo February 3rd, 2004 04:14 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
now this patch is tearing apart friends :(

TheAnnihilator February 3rd, 2004 04:37 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
i'm here to stick up for the 1.6 patch, i dont find a single thing wrong with it...

ScOrPY February 3rd, 2004 10:59 PM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
I cant judge it till i get it.

Mihail February 4th, 2004 05:37 AM

Re: Bf1942 the 1.6 patch suck nuts.
 
sherman tanks were pretty shitty tanks, they were very weak atleast compared to german and russian tanks, hell even britsh tanks like the church hill tank was better. I don't mind PB if you don't like it just disable it and don't go on any PB servers, problem sovled


All times are GMT -7.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.